[dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: Intel performance test is failing

[Chen, Zhaoyan]

Brandon, we almost made a workaround.

Maybe tomorrow, you could recover Intel’s testbed. I will let you know soon.



Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen

From: Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:34 AM
To: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>; dpdklab at iol.unh.edu; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; ci at dpdk.org; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu at intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing

Hi Zhaoyan,

Have you finished making changes on the Intel machine?
I will turn on the machine on March 3rd for testing if you do not have any issues with it.
Please let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:13 PM Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>> wrote:
Hi, Brandon,

Yes, it’s a wired issue. And it also mixed our DTS upgrading and Trex upgrading.
So we are reviewing our DTS script, different Trex version, and CI calling procedure.

Anyway, we are focusing on this task recently, any update will let you know.

Thanks.

Regards,
Zhaoyan Chen

From: Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 10:46 PM
To: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com<mailto:david.marchand at redhat.com>>
Cc: Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com<mailto:zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>>; dpdklab at iol.unh.edu<mailto:dpdklab at iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>>; Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net<mailto:thomas at monjalon.net>>; ci at dpdk.org<mailto:ci at dpdk.org>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu at intel.com<mailto:lijuan.tu at intel.com>>; Xu, Qian Q <qian.q.xu at intel.com<mailto:qian.q.xu at intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] Intel performance test is failing

Hi Zhaoyan,

How is the current status of the Intel 82599ES?
Were there any configuration changes made to fix performance issues?

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:11 AM Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>> wrote:
Hi David,

This was just a weird issue with the packet generator not cleaning itself after a test fast enough before another test.
I'll rerun the tests that were affected and keep an eye out to see if it's stable enough to be put back online.

Thanks

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:33 AM David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com<mailto:david.marchand at redhat.com>> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:14 PM Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>> wrote:
>
> Hi David and Zhaoyan,
>
>
> Yes, those results are related to the Intel machine; I have disabled testing for the Intel testbed.
>
> The 82599ES machine is now available for ssh and modifications.

Any news about this?

I received a failure on a patch of mine (changing macros in a ARM header).
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/9900/

But this time, it is with the 40G Intel nic test.

--
David Marchand


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>


--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>

www.iol.unh.edu<http://www.iol.unh.edu/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20200318/51dc4d77/attachment-0001.html>