[dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK

[Lincoln Lavoie]

This is the patch I was talking about, where we might now be missing a
requirement on those systems:
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/2020-October/000815.html

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:56 AM Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu> wrote:

> Hi Lijuan,
>
> Yes, we have "build_type=meson" in the execution.cfg file.
>
> DTS compiles DPDK using these commands:
> "CC=gcc meson --werror -Denable_kmods=True -Dlibdir=lib
> --default-library=static x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc"
> and
> "ninja -C x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc -j 62"
>
> Running functional tests, we get:
> "x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-testpmd: No such file or directory"
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:53 AM Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> I mean config “build_type=meson” in DTS/execution.cfg, Snice DPDK don’t
>> support “make” now, we have to use meson build.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ci <ci-bounces at dpdk.org> *On Behalf Of *Tu, Lijuan
>> *Sent:* 2020年10月20日 21:40
>> *To:* Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>;
>> Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
>> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; ci at dpdk.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
>>
>>
>>
>> Did you use meson build ?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>
>> *Sent:* 2020年10月20日 21:19
>> *To:* Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>; Tu, Lijuan <
>> lijuan.tu at intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen at intel.com>
>> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>; ci at dpdk.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
>>
>>
>>
>> I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers.
>> DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd, and it assumes that
>> testpmd is in the build's output directory.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Brandon
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is this because of the change that adds some python requirements to
>> testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lincoln
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK?
>> >
>> > Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile
>> > DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is
>> > not building testpmd.
>> > We are also using the latest commit available for DTS.
>>
>> No testpmd should be built.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Lincoln Lavoie*
>>
>> Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
>>
>> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
>>
>> lylavoie at iol.unh.edu
>>
>> https://www.iol.unh.edu
>>
>> +1-603-674-2755 (m)
>>
>> <https://www.iol.unh.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Brandon Lo
>>
>> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
>>
>> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
>>
>> blo at iol.unh.edu
>>
>> www.iol.unh.edu
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Brandon Lo
>
> UNH InterOperability Laboratory
>
> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824
>
> blo at iol.unh.edu
>
> www.iol.unh.edu
>


-- 
*Lincoln Lavoie*
Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie at iol.unh.edu
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
<https://www.iol.unh.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20201020/6e04a67f/attachment.html>