[dpdk-ci] Community CI Meeting Minutes

[Thomas Monjalon]

Then it should not be reported in patchwork.
Please let's not add more noise in patchwork.


26/08/2021 18:27, Lincoln Lavoie:
> This is specific to patches for DTS, where Intel doesn't have the
> infrastructure to run every possible test suite that is included in DTS.
> So, the warning is a notice to the submitter and the maintainer(s) the
> patch couldn't be tested. It's not really an issue related to the content
> of the patch itself (i.e. not about a breaking change or something like
> that).
> 
> Cheers,
> Lincoln
> 
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:05 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > 26/08/2021 15:33, Lincoln Lavoie:
> > > * For DTS CI, should authors be notified of skipped testing (i.e. CI
> > infrastructure doesn’t support that test suite)?  Should this be marked as
> > a warning in patchwork?  Agreed it should do both of these actions, notify
> > the author and mark the patch as warning in patchworks.
> >
> > Not sure to understand.
> > If a test is not supported, it is not an issue of the patch,
> > so why would it be reported in patchwork?