[dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab

[Zawadzki, Tomasz]

Hi Lincoln,

That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x.

The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if this is what you are seeing on your end too.

Thanks,
Tomek

From: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM
To: Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki at intel.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>; Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu>; dpdklab at iol.unh.edu; ci at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org; spdk at lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab

Thanks Tomek,

Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure is. :-P

Cheers,
Lincoln

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz <tomasz.zawadzki at intel.com<mailto:tomasz.zawadzki at intel.com>> wrote:
Hi Aaron,

Thank you for reporting this !

This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK.

I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK release, would be v21.01.x:
https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x

The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly:
https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320

Thanks,
Tomek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org<mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org>> On Behalf Of Aaron Conole
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM
> To: Brandon Lo <blo at iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo at iol.unh.edu>>
> Cc: dpdklab at iol.unh.edu<mailto:dpdklab at iol.unh.edu>; ci at dpdk.org<mailto:ci at dpdk.org>; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>; spdk at lists.01.org<mailto:spdk at lists.01.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
>
> Greetings,
>
> I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems
> to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure.
> The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't
> available when linking.
>
> Job details (for example):
> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results-
> uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20
> 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip
>
> Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of
> SPDK?  Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object?
> Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> -Aaron


--
Lincoln Lavoie
Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
lylavoie at iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylavoie at iol.unh.edu>
https://www.iol.unh.edu
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.iol.unh.edu/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20210208/c91b7273/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 588 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/ci/attachments/20210208/c91b7273/attachment-0001.jpg>