[dpdk-ci] [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other projects

Aaron Conole aconole at redhat.com
Thu Mar 25 17:14:21 CET 2021


"Tu, Lijuan" <lijuan.tu at intel.com> writes:

> Hi Ali,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>
>> Sent: 2021年3月15日 21:56
>> To: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu at intel.com>
>> Cc: ci at dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other projects
>> 
>> Hi Aaron and Lijuan,
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 5:55 PM
>> > To: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
>> > Cc: Lijuan Tu <lijuan.tu at intel.com>; ci at dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas
>> > Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
>> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] report format for adding checks to other
>> > projects
>> >
>> > Hi Aaron,
>> >
>> > > Hi Ali,
>> > >
>> > > There was a question today about submitting test reports for patches
>> > > that belong to other projects.  Specifically, the DTS project (found
>> > > at
>> > > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dts/list/)
>> > >
>> > > I believe there is no need to do anything different (because patch
>> > > ID should be unique across the patchwork instance, so the test
>> > > report will go to the correct patch), but wanted to confirm this is correct.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Same report format should work fine, but we have to make the Patchwork
>> > user CI <ci at dpdk.org> a maintainer for these projects. We'll do that
>> > soon and update.
>> >
>> 
>> The CI user is now a maintainer for the DTS project.
>> Please let me know if you see any issues with creating checks via email reports.
>
> We sent reports to dts project, and it works,
> e.g. http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dts/patch/1615946979-23566-1-git-send-email-hailinx.xu@intel.com/
> but we met another question, which  mail address should dts reports send to ?
> If reports sent to < test-report at dpdk.org>, it will be mixed with dpdk
> reports,
> e.g. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-March/183128.html
> And an tag [dpdk-test-report] will be added automatically, it's very confused for users.
> Therefore, Can we have a separated mail address for dts reports?

Is it really a problem to intermingle?  I think most of the 'users' of
this list will access via the patchwork front-end, yes?

>> 
>> Regards,
>> Ali



More information about the ci mailing list