21.11-staging CI run

Kevin Traynor ktraynor at redhat.com
Wed Apr 5 18:13:18 CEST 2023


On 05/04/2023 16:26, Patrick Robb wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 

Hi Patrick,

> We do use the Github mirror for the stable branches. However, the Github
> key change is not relevant here because we use https for our git operations
> on the stable branches.
> 
> This morning when you pushed to 21.11-staging, our system timed out when
> checking out to your commit. Just to check that the issue was reproducible,
> I reran the pipeline, and this time the checkout completed fine and a full
> series of tests was kicked off for 21.11-staging. I'm not sure if git was
> in a bad state or what, but I'm trying to find out more.
> 

ok, cool. It might be just a once off, I haven't seen that in the past. 
As a workaround, I can force push as it's a staging branch to re-trigger 
if it occurs again.

> Also, the scatter test failure you see on the 21.11-staging results is an
> infra issue on our side which is now resolved, and a rerun for that scatter
> test is put in so that will be corrected soon.
> 

Thanks for letting me know. I noticed that and saw that I hadn't pushed 
new Bcm patches, so figured it was an test/infra issue.

thanks,
Kevin.

> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 10:23 AM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/04/2023 13:36, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed that 21.11-staging was not kicking off CI the last 2-3 times I
>>> pushed to it.
>>>
>>> It may have been caused by the recent github key change?
>>>
>>> That is resolved now for dpdk.org -> github replication and I pushed
>>> today, but I still didn't see any CI run started.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if 21.11-staging is monitoring dpdk.org or github, and also
>>> has an issue with keys, or if there is some other issue.
>>>
>>> Could someone take a look and check?
>>>
>>
>> Update, I see some tests running on 21.11-staging now. Not sure if it
>> was just a delay after my push earlier, or someone updated something -
>> if so, thanks!
>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Kevin.
>>
>>
> 



More information about the ci mailing list