[PATCH v2] tools: check for pending test status when parsing emails
Patrick Robb
probb at iol.unh.edu
Thu Jun 27 19:04:14 CEST 2024
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240627075755.66386-1-sthotton@marvell.com/
Thanks Ali. I see pending for this patch for ABI testing. We will look
in a couple of hours and it should by then have updated to pass/fail.
Assuming that we don't notice any weird behavior, we will merge our PR
tomorrow morning for the remaining PW contexts we report (currently we
still only have ABI pending enabled).
One thing we didn't think about when we set this up was the "S/W/F"
counter that can be seen from
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/. That does not include
pending. I guess that will be something to discuss at our next CI
meeting!
Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ali Alnubani <alialnu at nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adam Hassick <ahassick at iol.unh.edu>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 10:32 PM
> > To: Patrick Robb <probb at iol.unh.edu>
> > Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>; ci at dpdk.org; NBU-Contact-Thomas
> > Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas at monjalon.net>; Ali Alnubani
> > <alialnu at nvidia.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: check for pending test status when parsing emails
> >
> > Ali,
> >
> > I've been monitoring Patchwork today after rolling out the feature on
> > just the ABI context, and I've noticed that checks with "pending"
> > status do not appear in the table or in the Patchwork API. I only see
> > the check appear in the table/API once the final "success" check is
> > sent.
> >
> > Here's a thread that I've been tracking for example:
> > http://inbox.dpdk.org/test-
> > report/667c6064.050a0220.f0848.4472SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING at mx.google.c
> > om/T/#u
> > It looks to me that the "Test-Status" tag is set correctly.
> >
> > Is it possible there are errors when adding the checks on the Patchwork end?
> >
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I just realized that I pulled the new change in the wrong path. Can you please try now?
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
More information about the ci
mailing list