From patrickrobb1997 at gmail.com Fri May 1 03:30:54 2026 From: patrickrobb1997 at gmail.com (Patrick Robb) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 21:30:54 -0400 Subject: April 30, 2026 CI meeting minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 3:51?PM Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > > * There are a number of patches that are ready for review by Patrick / > Luca. > > ACK I will take a look and start running from these this weekend. I'm on the community lab VPN now so once my lab account password is reset I should be good to review/test patches. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patrickrobb1997 at gmail.com Fri May 1 03:38:23 2026 From: patrickrobb1997 at gmail.com (Patrick Robb) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 21:38:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] add 25.11 Intel crypto performance report In-Reply-To: <2959110.Y6S9NjorxK@thomas> References: <20260429152129.125882-1-yingyax.han@intel.com> <2959110.Y6S9NjorxK@thomas> Message-ID: Hi Andrew, Please take a look at: https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_25_11_Intel_crypto_performance_report.pdf You have a 4xxx QAT device on the intel-1 server which you are running the DTS dpdk-test-crypto-perf testsuite on, right? I think it is a good idea for you to review the performance report above to check their performance tuning and configuration section, the test methodology section, and compare your 4xxx results against the 4xxx results in this report. Your 4xxx device may differ from the specific SKU the Intel team used, but I imagine they will be within an order of magnitude (or probably much closer). On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 5:36?AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 29/04/2026 17:21, Yingya.Han: > > +- [DPDK 25.11 Intel Crypto Performance Report] > > + (// > fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_25_11_Intel_crypto_performance_report.pdf) > > Applied, thanks. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From abailey at iol.unh.edu Fri May 1 16:58:04 2026 From: abailey at iol.unh.edu (Andrew Bailey) Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 10:58:04 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] add 25.11 Intel crypto performance report In-Reply-To: References: <20260429152129.125882-1-yingyax.han@intel.com> <2959110.Y6S9NjorxK@thomas> Message-ID: Thanks Patrick, I have downloaded this report and at a quick glance, I can tell this will be super helpful. Unfortunately, we had to disable the QAT tests on the intel-1 server for the short term but I will absolutely refer back to this document when we get it back up and running again. Best, Andrew On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 9:38?PM Patrick Robb wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Please take a look at: > https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_25_11_Intel_crypto_performance_report.pdf > > You have a 4xxx QAT device on the intel-1 server which you are running the > DTS dpdk-test-crypto-perf testsuite on, right? I think it is a good idea > for you to review the performance report above to check their performance > tuning and configuration section, the test methodology section, and compare > your 4xxx results against the 4xxx results in this report. Your 4xxx device > may differ from the specific SKU the Intel team used, but I imagine they > will be within an order of magnitude (or probably much closer). > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: