[PATCH 000/227] use NUMA node terminology across the tree

[Aaron Conole]

Chengwen Feng <chengwen.feng at linux.dev> writes:

> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen at huawei.com>
>
> The DPDK tree conflates CPU sockets with NUMA memory nodes: public
> APIs, structure fields and macros are named after "socket" although
> they actually identify a NUMA node (e.g. rte_socket_id(), the
> socket_id field of rte_memzone, SOCKET_ID_ANY). This naming misleads
> application developers and pollutes vendor code that targets NUMA
> topologies.
>
> This series renames the terminology tree-wide:

Do not do this again.

I have set the robot from considering patches from you for the next 227
hours.  One for each hour that a patch-by-patch test would take.  Do not
repost this series again and expect the github robot to run for it.
Please work with existing maintainers to come up with a plan for each
area rename.

CI resources are shared, and in the case of the github robot, they are
shared among OVS, OVN, and DPDK.  Additionally, a 227 patch series is
completely unreviewable, and completely inconsiderate of reviewers time.
Anything above 15 patches is, truly - who can keep that much details in
mind.