[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: bug fix of compile error

[Zhang, Helin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 7:13 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: bug fix of compile error
> 
> 2014-12-01 15:33, Helin Zhang:
> > The compile error will occur as below when set
> 'RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16BYTE_RX_DESC=y'.
> > The changes is just to fix it.
> >
> > lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c: In function i40e_rxd_build_fdir:
> > lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c:431:28: error: volatile union
> > <anonymous> has no member named fd
> > lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c:427:19: error: unused variable flexbl
> > [-Werror=unused-variable]
> > lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c:427:11: error: unused variable flexbh
> > [-Werror=unused-variable]
> 
> It would be nice to reference the commit which introduced the error and explain
> it a bit.
> 
> > -			rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.qword3.hi_dword.flex_bytes_hi);
> > +			rte_le_to_cpu_32(
> > +			rxdp->wb.qword3.hi_dword.flex_bytes_hi);
> [...]
> > -			rte_le_to_cpu_32(rxdp->wb.qword3.lo_dword.flex_bytes_lo);
> > +			rte_le_to_cpu_32(
> > +			rxdp->wb.qword3.lo_dword.flex_bytes_lo);
> 
> Why are you wrapping these lines (with wrong indentation)?
> It makes the fix confuse.
Sorry, it is a code style fix, as the length of the line should not be more than 80.
Do I need to split the patch or add more commit logs?

> 
> --
> Thomas

Regards,
Helin