[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/10] app/testpmd:test VxLAN Tx checksum offload
olivier.matz at 6wind.com
Fri Nov 7 18:16:06 CET 2014
On 11/07/2014 01:43 AM, Yong Wang wrote:
>>> As to HW TX checksum offload, do you have special requirement for implementing TSO?
>> Yes. TSO implies TX TCP and IP checksum offload.
> Is this a general requirement or something specific to ixgbe/i40e? FWIW,
> vmxnet3 device does not support tx IP checksum offload but doe support
> TSO. In that case, we cannot leave IP checksum field as 0 (the correct
> checksum needs to be filled in the header) before passing it the the NIC
> when TSO is enabled.
This is a good question because we need to define the proper API that
will work on other PMDs in the future.
Indeed, there is a hardware specificity in ixgbe: when TSO is enabled,
the IP checksum flag must also be passed to the driver if it's IPv4.
>From 82599 datasheets (184.108.40.206.4 Advanced Transmit Data Descriptor):
IXSM (bit 0) — Insert IP Checksum: This field indicates that IP
checksum must be inserted. In IPv6 mode, it must be reset to 0b.
If DCMD.TSE and TUCMD.IPV4 are set, IXSM must be set as well.
If this bit is set, the packet should at least contain an
If we allow the user to give the TSO flag without the IP checksum
flag in mbuf flags, the ixgbe driver would have to set the IP checksum
flag in hardware descriptors if the packet is IPv4. The driver would
have to parse the IP header: this is not a problem as we already need
it for TCP checksum.
To summarize, I think we have 3 options when transmitting a packet to be
segmented using TSO:
- set IP checksum to 0 in the application: in this case, it would
require additional work in virtual drivers if the peer expects
to receive a packet with a valid IP checksum. But I'm wondering
what is the need for calculating a checksum when transmitting on
a virtual device (the peer receiving the packet knows that the
packet is not corrupted as it comes from memory). Moreover, if the
device advertise TSO, I assume it can also advertise IP checksum
- calculate the IP checksum in the application. It would take additional
cycles although it may not be needed as the driver probably knows
how to calculate it.
- if the driver supports both TSO and IP checksum, the 2 flags MUST
be given to the driver and the IP checksum must be set to 0 and the
checksum cannot be calculated in software. If the driver only
supports TSO, the checksum has to be calculated in software.
Currently, I choosen the first solution, but I'm open to change the
design. Maybe the 3rd one is also a good solution.
By the way, we had the same kind of discussion with Konstantin 
about what to do with the TCP checksum. My feeling is that setting it
to the pseudo-header checksum is the best we can do:
- linux does that
- many hardware requires that (this is not the case for ixgbe, which
need a pshdr checksum without the IP len)
- it can be reused if received by a virtual device and sent to a
physical device supporting TSO
More information about the dev