[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/librte_pmd_i40e: set vlan filter fix

[Zhang, Helin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Huawei Xie
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 10:46 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/librte_pmd_i40e: set vlan filter fix
> 
> ">> 5" rather than ">> 4"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huawei Xie <huawei.xie at intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 5074262..c0cf3cf 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -4048,14 +4048,11 @@ i40e_set_vlan_filter(struct i40e_vsi *vsi,  {
>  	uint32_t vid_idx, vid_bit;
> 
> -#define UINT32_BIT_MASK      0x1F
> -#define VALID_VLAN_BIT_MASK  0xFFF
>  	/* VFTA is 32-bits size array, each element contains 32 vlan bits, Find the
>  	 *  element first, then find the bits it belongs to
>  	 */
> -	vid_idx = (uint32_t) ((vlan_id & VALID_VLAN_BIT_MASK) >>
> -		  sizeof(uint32_t));
> -	vid_bit = (uint32_t) (1 << (vlan_id & UINT32_BIT_MASK));
> +	vid_idx = (uint32_t) ((vlan_id >> 5 ) & 0x7F);
> +	vid_bit = (uint32_t) (1 << (vlan_id & 0x1F));
I don't understand why remove macros and use numeric instead?

> 
>  	if (on)
>  		vsi->vfta[vid_idx] |= vid_bit;
> --
> 1.8.1.4

Regards,
Helin