[dpdk-dev] bifurcated driver
Luke Gorrie
luke at snabb.co
Mon Nov 24 12:57:43 CET 2014
On 5 November 2014 at 14:00, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
wrote:
> It seems to be close to the bifurcated driver needs.
> Not sure if it can solve the security issues if there is no dedicated MMU
> in the NIC.
>
> I feel we should sum up pros and cons of
> - igb_uio
> - uio_pci_generic
> - VFIO
> - ibverbs
> - bifurcated driver
>
I am also curious about the pros and cons of the bifurcated driver compared
with SR-IOV.
What are the practical differences between running a bifurcated driver vs.
running SR-IOV mode where the kernel owns the PF and userspace applications
own the VFs?
Specifically, could I run the ixgbe driver in the kernel (max_vfs=N),
control it via ethtool, and then access the queues via userspace VF
drivers? If so, how would this differ from the bifurcated driver?
Cheers,
-Luke
More information about the dev
mailing list