[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] Update build process
Neil Horman
nhorman at tuxdriver.com
Mon Oct 6 18:05:48 CEST 2014
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:01:33PM +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:49:46AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:52:31AM +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> > > As per the proposal, this patch set does:
> > > - Remove CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS as a configuration option.
> > > - For static library, build a single/combined library.
> > > - For shared libraries, build both individual/separated and single/combined
> > > libraries.
> > > - Link apps only against single/combined libs.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sergio Gonzalez Monroy (4):
> > > Link combined shared library using CC
> > > Link apps only against single/combined library
> > > Update library build process
> > > Link apps/DSOs against EXECENV_LDLIBS with --as-needed
> > >
> > > config/common_bsdapp | 3 +-
> > > config/common_linuxapp | 3 +-
> > > mk/rte.app.mk | 164 ++-----------------------------------------------
> > > mk/rte.lib.mk | 81 ++++++------------------
> > > mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk | 2 +-
> > > mk/rte.sharelib.mk | 54 ++++++++--------
> > > mk/rte.vars.mk | 4 --
> > > 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I see you removed the --whole-archive option when building the single library
> > here. Have you checked to make sure that all the constructors haven't been
> > stripped out?
>
> I am not entirely sure I follow. There is no --whole-archive when building libraries,
> at least not in my sources.
> The flag is used when linking apps and I have not removed it as you can see on patch 2/4.
>
> Sergio
You're right, I saw in one of your patches --whole-archive, but it was context,
not actual change, sorry
Neil
>
> > Neil
> >
>
More information about the dev
mailing list