[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/20] i40e: call i40e_txd_enable_checksum only for offloaded packets

Olivier MATZ olivier.matz at 6wind.com
Tue Feb 10 18:06:56 CET 2015


Hi Helin,

On 02/10/2015 07:03 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
>>   		/* Enable checksum offloading */
>>   		cd_tunneling_params = 0;
>> -		i40e_txd_enable_checksum(ol_flags, &td_cmd, &td_offset,
>> -						l2_len, l3_len, outer_l2_len,
>> -						outer_l3_len,
>> -						&cd_tunneling_params);
>> +		if (ol_flags & I40E_TX_CKSUM_OFFLOAD_MASK) {
> likely should be added.

I would say unlikely() instead. I think the non-offload case should be
the default one. What do you think?

>> +			i40e_txd_enable_checksum(ol_flags, &td_cmd, &td_offset,
>> +				l2_len, l3_len, outer_l2_len,
>> +				outer_l3_len,
>> +				&cd_tunneling_params);
>> +		}
> As this code changes are in fast path, performance regression test is needed. I would
> like to see the performance difference with or without this patch set. Hopefully nothing
> different. If you need any helps, just let me know.

I'm sorry, I won't have the needed resources to bench this as I
would have to setup a performance platform with i40e devices.

But I'm pretty sure that the code in non-offload case would be faster
with this patch as it will avoid many operations in
i40e_txd_enable_checksum().

For the offload case, as we also removed the if (l2_len == 0)
and if (l3_len == 0), I think there are also less tests than before
my patch series.

So in my opinion, adding this test does not really justify to check the
performance.

Regards,
Olivier



More information about the dev mailing list