[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 03/14] eal/pci, ethdev: Remove assumption that port will not be detached

Thomas Monjalon thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com
Tue Feb 17 01:36:14 CET 2015


2015-02-16 13:14, Tetsuya Mukawa:
> To remove assumption, do like followings.
> 
> This patch adds "RTE_PCI_DRV_DETACHABLE" to drv_flags of rte_pci_driver
> structure. The flags indicate the driver can detach devices at runtime.
> Also, remove assumption that port will not be detached.
> 
> To remove the assumption.
> - Add 'attached' member to rte_eth_dev structure.
>   This member is used for indicating the port is attached, or not.
> - Add rte_eth_dev_allocate_new_port().
>   This function is used for allocating new port.
> 
> v8:
> - NONE_TRACE is changed to NO_TRACE.
>   (Thanks to Iremonger, Bernard)
> v5:
> - Change parameters of rte_eth_dev_validate_port() to cleanup code.
> v4:
> - Use braces with 'for' loop.
> - Fix indent of 'if' statement.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa at igel.co.jp>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h |   2 +
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c           | 454 +++++++++++++-------------------
>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h           |   5 +
>  3 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 275 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> index 7b48b55..7f2d699 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ struct rte_pci_driver {
>  #define RTE_PCI_DRV_FORCE_UNBIND 0x0004
>  /** Device driver supports link state interrupt */
>  #define RTE_PCI_DRV_INTR_LSC	0x0008
> +/** Device driver supports detaching capability */
> +#define RTE_PCI_DRV_DETACHABLE	0x0010
>  
>  /**< Internal use only - Macro used by pci addr parsing functions **/
>  #define GET_PCIADDR_FIELD(in, fd, lim, dlm)                   \
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> index ea3a1fb..a79fa5b 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -175,6 +175,16 @@ enum {
>  	STAT_QMAP_RX
>  };
>  
> +enum {
> +	DEV_INVALID = 0,
> +	DEV_VALID,
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> +	DEV_DISCONNECTED = 0,
> +	DEV_CONNECTED
> +};

The commit log explains what is an attached port but not what means
valid or connected.
These enums should have a comment to explain their usage.

> +
>  static inline void
>  rte_eth_dev_data_alloc(void)
>  {
> @@ -201,19 +211,34 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocated(const char *name)
>  {
>  	unsigned i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < nb_ports; i++) {
> -		if (strcmp(rte_eth_devices[i].data->name, name) == 0)
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) {
> +		if ((rte_eth_devices[i].attached == DEV_CONNECTED) &&
> +		    strcmp(rte_eth_devices[i].data->name, name) == 0)
>  			return &rte_eth_devices[i];
>  	}
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static uint8_t
> +rte_eth_dev_allocate_new_port(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) {
> +		if (rte_eth_devices[i].attached == DEV_DISCONNECTED)
> +			return i;
> +	}
> +	return RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS;
> +}

This function does not allocate a new port.
It get the first free port id.

Is uint8_t sill a good size for hotpluggable virtual device ids?

> +
>  struct rte_eth_dev *
>  rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name)
>  {
> +	uint8_t port_id;
>  	struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev;
>  
> -	if (nb_ports == RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS) {
> +	port_id = rte_eth_dev_allocate_new_port();
> +	if (port_id == RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS) {
>  		PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Reached maximum number of Ethernet ports\n");
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> @@ -226,10 +251,12 @@ rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name)
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> -	eth_dev = &rte_eth_devices[nb_ports];
> -	eth_dev->data = &rte_eth_dev_data[nb_ports];
> +	eth_dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> +	eth_dev->data = &rte_eth_dev_data[port_id];
>  	snprintf(eth_dev->data->name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name), "%s", name);
> -	eth_dev->data->port_id = nb_ports++;
> +	eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
> +	eth_dev->attached = DEV_CONNECTED;
> +	nb_ports++;
>  	return eth_dev;
>  }
>  
> @@ -283,6 +310,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_init(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv,
>  			(unsigned) pci_dev->id.device_id);
>  	if (rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY)
>  		rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> +	eth_dev->attached = DEV_DISCONNECTED;
>  	nb_ports--;
>  	return diag;
>  }
> @@ -308,10 +336,28 @@ rte_eth_driver_register(struct eth_driver *eth_drv)
>  	rte_eal_pci_register(&eth_drv->pci_drv);
>  }
>  
> +enum {
> +	NO_TRACE = 0,
> +	TRACE
> +};

What means this enum?

> +
> +static int
> +rte_eth_dev_validate_port(uint8_t port_id, int trace)
> +{
> +	if (port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS ||
> +	    rte_eth_devices[port_id].attached != DEV_CONNECTED) {
> +		if (trace) {
> +			PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Invalid port_id=%d\n", port_id);
> +		}

It's not common in DPDK to have a parameter to toggle log.
It should be enabled globally via the log level.

> +		return DEV_INVALID;

It would be simpler to return 0 in a function called "is_valid_port".

> +	} else
> +		return DEV_VALID;

So it could 1 (true) here.

[...]
> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> @@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev {
>  	struct eth_dev_ops *dev_ops;    /**< Functions exported by PMD */
>  	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< PCI info. supplied by probing */
>  	struct rte_eth_dev_cb_list callbacks; /**< User application callbacks */
> +	uint8_t attached; /**< Flag indicating the port is attached */
>  };
>  
>  struct rte_eth_dev_sriov {
> @@ -1604,6 +1605,10 @@ extern struct rte_eth_dev rte_eth_devices[];
>   * initialized by the [matching] Ethernet driver during the PCI probing phase.
>   * All devices whose port identifier is in the range
>   * [0,  rte_eth_dev_count() - 1] can be operated on by network applications.
> + * immediately after invoking rte_eal_init().
> + * If the application unplugs a port using hotplug function, The enabled port
> + * numbers may be noncontiguous. In the case, the applications need to manage
> + * enabled port by themselves.
>   *
>   * @return
>   *   - The total number of usable Ethernet devices.
> 




More information about the dev mailing list