[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix check for split packets

[Lu, Wenzhuo]

Hi Bruce,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:25 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix check for split packets
> 
> The check for split packets to be reassembled in the vector ixgbe PMD was
> incorrectly only checking the first 16 elements of the array instead of all 32. This
> is fixed by changing the uint32_t values to be uint64_t instead.
> 
> Fixes: cf4b4708a88a ("ixgbe: improve slow-path perf with vector scattered Rx")
> 
> Reported-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> index 9f24849..cdad3e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct
> rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	/* happy day case, full burst + no packets to be joined */
> -	const uint32_t *split_fl32 = (uint32_t *)split_flags;
> +	const uint64_t *split_fl32 = (uint64_t *)split_flags;
Why not change the name to split_fl64? I don't think it's appropriate to keep it be split_fl32.
Thanks.

>  	if (rxq->pkt_first_seg == NULL &&
>  			split_fl32[0] == 0 && split_fl32[1] == 0 &&
>  			split_fl32[2] == 0 && split_fl32[3] == 0)
> --
> 1.8.3.1