[dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal

O'Driscoll, Tim tim.odriscoll at intel.com
Thu Oct 29 17:23:08 CET 2015



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:43 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> 2015-10-29 15:21, O'Driscoll, Tim:
> > Scope
> > -----
> > Issues that are within the scope of the Architecture Board include:
> > - Project scope/charter. What is and isn't within the scope of the
> project? What happens if somebody wants to upstream a new
> library/capability and it's not clear whether it fits within DPDK or
> not? As a random example, if somebody wanted to upstream a DPDK-enabled
> TCP/IP stack to dpdk.org, should that be accepted or rejected?
> 
> Do you mean the scope of this board would be about the whole projects
> hosted
> on dpdk.org (http://dpdk.org/browse/) or only the DPDK
> (http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk)?
> 
> Using your TCP stack example, I think it should be hosted on dpdk.org
> but it may be out of the scope of the DPDK tree.

Good question. I think the scope should be just the DPDK project.



More information about the dev mailing list