[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] net/fm10k: implement new Rx checksum flag

Chen, Jing D jing.d.chen at intel.com
Mon Aug 29 11:32:34 CEST 2016


Hi,

>  uint16_t
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> index 9ea747e..8c08b44 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> @@ -95,8 +95,10 @@ fm10k_desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct rte_mbuf
> **rx_pkts)
>  	const __m128i l3l4cksum_flag = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
>  			0, 0, 0, 0,
>  			0, 0, 0, 0,
> -			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD,
> -			PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD, PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD, 0);
> +			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD) >> 1,
> +			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD) >>
> 1,
> +			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD | PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_BAD) >>
> 1,
> +			(PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD |
> PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD) >> 1);

Can we define a macro, like "#define RTE_CKSUM_SHIFT 1" to avoid numeric?

> 
>  	const __m128i rxe_flag = _mm_set_epi8(0, 0, 0, 0,
>  			0, 0, 0, 0,
> @@ -139,6 +141,7 @@ fm10k_desc_to_olflags_v(__m128i descs[4], struct
> rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
>  	/* Process L4/L3 checksum error flags */
>  	cksumflag = _mm_srli_epi16(cksumflag, L3L4EFLAG_SHIFT);
>  	cksumflag = _mm_shuffle_epi8(l3l4cksum_flag, cksumflag);
> +	cksumflag = _mm_slli_epi16(cksumflag, 1);
>  	vtag1 = _mm_or_si128(cksumflag, vtag1);
> 
>  	vol.dword = _mm_cvtsi128_si64(vtag1);
> --
> 1.9.3

Besides that, just realize we should remove "hw_ip_checksum" check in func
fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check() since we already support it.
Can you help to make the change?


More information about the dev mailing list