[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] app/testpmd: use ixgbe public functions

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Dec 9 12:56:31 CET 2016


On 12/9/2016 11:27 AM, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> Use the the following ixgbe public functions:
> 
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rx
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rxmode
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_tx
> rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_vlan_filter
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger at intel.com>

<...>

> @@ -2388,23 +2391,11 @@ int
>  set_vf_rate_limit(portid_t port_id, uint16_t vf, uint16_t rate, uint64_t q_msk)
>  {
>  	int diag;
> -	struct rte_eth_link link;
> -
> -	if (q_msk == 0)
> -		return 0;
>  
> -	if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
> -		return 1;
> -	rte_eth_link_get_nowait(port_id, &link);
> -	if (rate > link.link_speed) {
> -		printf("Invalid rate value:%u bigger than link speed: %u\n",
> -			rate, link.link_speed);
> -		return 1;
> -	}

Why these changes required? Isn't only change is location and naming of
the ...set_vf_rate_limit() ?

> -	diag = rte_eth_set_vf_rate_limit(port_id, vf, rate, q_msk);
> +	diag = rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit(port_id, vf, rate, q_msk);
>  	if (diag == 0)
>  		return diag;
> -	printf("rte_eth_set_vf_rate_limit for port_id=%d failed diag=%d\n",
> +	printf("rte_pmd_ixgbe_set_vf_rate_limit for port_id=%d failed diag=%d\n",
>  		port_id, diag);
>  	return diag;
>  }
> 



More information about the dev mailing list