[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
Jerin Jacob
jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com
Fri Feb 19 01:34:25 CET 2016
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:26:44AM +0000, Kobylinski, MichalX wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob at caviumnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 5:44 PM
> > To: Kobylinski, MichalX <michalx.kobylinski at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; viktorin at rehivetech.com
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
> > Importance: High
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:27:02PM +0000, Kobylinski, MichalX wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > > > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:29 PM
> > > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > > Cc: viktorin at rehivetech.com
> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
> > > >
> > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > Jerin Jacob (3):
> > > > lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic
> > > > lpm: add support for NEON
> > > > maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and
> > > > lpm
> > > >
> > > > MAINTAINERS | 3 +
> > > > app/test/test_lpm.c | 21 ++--
> > > > app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h | 67 +++++++++++++
> > > > config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc | 3 -
> > > > config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc | 3 -
> > > > lib/librte_lpm/Makefile | 6 ++
> > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 99 ++-----------------
> > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h | 148
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h | 143
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 9 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) create mode
> > > > 100644 app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h create mode 100644
> > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h create mode 100644
> > > > lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.1.0
> > >
> > > Hi Jerin,
> >
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > > Are you planning increase next_hop field for ARM? I extended next_hop field
> > from 8 bits to 24 bits and created structure to configure LPM for x86.
> >
> > Yes, I am planning to increase next_hop field for ARM as a separate patch. Let
> > this base patchset get merges.
> >
> > I will make ARM specific changes for your new feature in 'rte_lpm_lookupx4' as
> > a separate patch on top of your series.
> > So that in case if I want to go back to 8 bit then I can do it
> >
> > Jerin
>
> Thank you for your answer.
> Do you prepare separate patch with changes for ARM architecture on the top my series?
> If you want I can support you with prepare new patch.
Yes, Can you rebase your patch with this patch(add lpm support for NEON).
I can fill in ARM specific changes of 'rte_lpm_lookupx4' as a seperate
patch on top it.
Jerin
>
> Michal
>
> >
> > > Please look at my patchset with proposal increase next_hop field and structure
> > to configure.
> > >
> > > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/
> > > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Michal
> > >
More information about the dev
mailing list