[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix x550 VF tx issue

Lu, Wenzhuo wenzhuo.lu at intel.com
Mon Feb 22 06:28:05 CET 2016
Previous message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix x550 VF tx issue
Next message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/5] add virtio offload support in us-vhost
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Konstantin,
Many thanks for your review and comments. Sorry for the late response. Please see inline :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 12:45 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix x550 VF tx issue
> 
> Hi Wenzhuo,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wenzhuo Lu
> > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 7:48 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix x550 VF tx issue
> >
> > On x550, the basic tx function may not work if we use DPDK VF based on
> > kernel PF. The reason is kernel PF enables a new feature "malicious
> > driver detection". According to this feature, driver should create TX
> > context descriptor and set the "Check Context" bit in advanced data
> descriptor.
> > This patch add the support of "malicious driver detection" to let
> > kernel PF based DPDK VF work.
> 
> Is there any way for VF to determine is MDD is enabled on PF or not?
> Mailbox message or something?
> If not, then I suppose for x550 VF we always have to set default txq_flags in
> dev_info to PKT_TX_MALICIOUS_DRIVER_DETECT?
> Which means that for X550 VF simple TX path by default will be disabled,
> correct?
The bad news is now there's no way for VF to know if the MDD is enabled. But PF will disable MDD by default.
And MDD will impact the performance. So, I think VF better disable MDD by default either.

> As alternative we probably can change tx_queue_start() for x550 VF to
> always setup a dummy TCD and then make changes in TX simple path to
> always setup CC bit for x550 VF.
> That would allow to keep using TX simple for x550 VF , no matter is MDD is
> enabled by PF or not.
Any suggestion about how to set the dummy TCD? Thanks.
I think TCD is used to describe the data, so it should match the packets. So, I'm sure how to create a dummy TCD :(

> 
> Another thing - there could be a potential slowdown with that feature:
> As now TX has to occupy one extra HW context, even if no HW offload is
> requested by SW,  correct?
> Let say if app sends packets of 3 types:
> - TCP with TX HW csum offload
> - UDP with TX HW csum offload
> - packets with no HW offload requested
> Then on 82599 VF no PMD would need to setup TCD only fist 2 times.
> But on X550 VF will need to setup new TCD for every packet.
> But I suppose that is unavoidable.
Yes, I agree. There's performance impact and seems unavoidable.

> 
> >
> > Although CC bit should be set in IOV mode, as tested, it's no harm to
> > set CC bit in non-IVO mode. So, as PF and VF share the same code, will
> > set CC bit anyway.
> 
> I don't think it totally harmless.
> As I understand, if CC bit is set HW would try to apply related TC to the
> packet.
> If this TC was never setup - you don't know what values it will contain.
I agree with you, although as tested, the NULL TC doesn't cause any problem.
In this scenario, better only set CC bit for VF. I'll try to do that.

> 
> >
> > Please aware there's another way, disabling MDD in PF kernel driver.
> > Like this,
> > >insmod ixgbe.ko MDD=0,0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c       | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h       |  3 ++-
> >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h        |  1 +
> >  lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h           |  3 ++-
> >  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst
> > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst
> > index 99de186..90f81e0 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_3.rst
> > @@ -15,6 +15,18 @@ EAL
> >  Drivers
> >  ~~~~~~~
> >
> > +* **ixgbe: Fixed x550 VF tx issue.**
> > +
> > +  On x550, the basic tx function may not work if we use DPDK VF based
> > + on  kernel PF. The reason is kernel PF enables a new feature
> > + "malicious driver  detection". According to this feature, driver
> > + should create TX context  descriptor and set the "Check Context" bit in
> advanced data descriptor.
> > +  This patch add the support of "malicious driver detection" to let
> > + kernel PF  based DPDK VF work.
> > +
> > +  Please aware there's another way, disabling MDD in PF kernel driver.
> > +  Like this,
> > +  >insmod ixgbe.ko MDD=0,0
> >
> >  Libraries
> >  ~~~~~~~~~
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index 52a263c..c8a7740 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -85,7 +85,8 @@
> >  		PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT |		 \
> >  		PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM |		 \
> >  		PKT_TX_L4_MASK |		 \
> > -		PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)
> > +		PKT_TX_TCP_SEG |		 \
> > +		PKT_TX_MALICIOUS_DRIVER_DETECT)
> >
> >  static inline struct rte_mbuf *
> >  rte_rxmbuf_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp) @@ -564,6 +565,8 @@
> > ixgbe_xmit_cleanup(struct ixgbe_tx_queue *txq)
> >  	return (0);
> >  }
> >
> > +#define DEFAULT_CTX_L2_LEN 14
> 
> Use sizeof(strutct eth_hdr) or something.
Honestly the 14 comes from datasheet. I think your idea is better :)

> 
> > +
> >  uint16_t
> >  ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> >  		uint16_t nb_pkts)
> > @@ -614,11 +617,19 @@ ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
> **tx_pkts,
> >  		 * are needed for offload functionality.
> >  		 */
> >  		ol_flags = tx_pkt->ol_flags;
> > +		if (!(txq->txq_flags & ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMDD))
> > +			ol_flags |= PKT_TX_MALICIOUS_DRIVER_DETECT;
> 
> Probably a bit better introduce new filed inside txq: deaul_ol_flags or
> something, Then set it up depending on HW type, and then just:
> 
> ol_flags = tx_pkt->ol_flags | txq->default_ol_flags;
I think you mean doing this way can decrease the performance impact, right? Let me figure out how to do it?

> 
> 
> >
> >  		/* If hardware offload required */
> >  		tx_ol_req = ol_flags & IXGBE_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK;
> >  		if (tx_ol_req) {
> > -			tx_offload.l2_len = tx_pkt->l2_len;
> > +			/* if l2 len isn't provided by the caller, give it a
> > +			 * default value.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (tx_pkt->l2_len == 0)
> > +				tx_offload.l2_len = DEFAULT_CTX_L2_LEN;
> > +			else
> > +				tx_offload.l2_len = tx_pkt->l2_len;
> 
> So with l2_len==0 what would happen?
> PF would stop the queue?
Even worse. As I remember, PF will reset the VF.

> 
> 
> >  			tx_offload.l3_len = tx_pkt->l3_len;
> >  			tx_offload.l4_len = tx_pkt->l4_len;
> >  			tx_offload.vlan_tci = tx_pkt->vlan_tci; @@ -801,6
> +812,7 @@
> > ixgbe_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> >  		}
> >
> >  		olinfo_status |= (pkt_len << IXGBE_ADVTXD_PAYLEN_SHIFT);
> > +		olinfo_status |= IXGBE_ADVTXD_CC;
> 
> As I said, probably safer to set CC bit  only if (tx_ol_req != 0).
Yes, it's better. I thought I need to check if it's VF. But seems maybe I only need to check this ol flag.
Thanks for the suggestion:)

> 
> >
> >  		m_seg = tx_pkt;
> >  		do {
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h index 475a800..bcde785 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h
> > @@ -255,7 +255,8 @@ struct ixgbe_txq_ops {
> >   * RTE_PMD_IXGBE_TX_MAX_BURST.
> >   */
> >  #define IXGBE_SIMPLE_FLAGS ((uint32_t)ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMULTSEGS |
> \
> > -			    ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS)
> > +			    ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS | \
> > +			    ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMDD)
> >
> >  /*
> >   * Populate descriptors with the following info:
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> > b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h index bada8ad..a2e32d0 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h
> > @@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ struct rte_eth_rxconf {  #define
> > ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMSCTP 0x0200 /**< disable SCTP checksum offload
> */
> > #define ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMUDP  0x0400 /**< disable UDP checksum
> > offload */  #define ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMTCP  0x0800 /**< disable TCP
> > checksum offload */
> > +#define ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOMDD      0x1000 /**< disable malicious driver
> detection */
> >  #define ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS \
> >  		(ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOVLANOFFL |
> ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMSCTP | \
> >  		 ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMUDP  |
> ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMTCP) diff --git
> > a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h index
> > f234ac9..b5ed25c 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ extern "C" {
> >
> >  /* add new TX flags here */
> >
> > +#define PKT_TX_MALICIOUS_DRIVER_DETECT (1ULL << 48)
> >  /**
> >   * Second VLAN insertion (QinQ) flag.
> >   */
> > @@ -824,7 +825,7 @@ struct rte_mbuf {
> >  	struct rte_mempool *pool; /**< Pool from which mbuf was allocated.
> */
> >  	struct rte_mbuf *next;    /**< Next segment of scattered packet. */
> >
> > -	/* fields to support TX offloads */
> > +	/* fields to support malicious driver detection or TX offloads */
> 
> No fields are really updated, so probably no need to update comments here.
It's reminder. As the users may not know if the MDD can work as expected depends on these fields.

> 
> >  	union {
> >  		uint64_t tx_offload;       /**< combined for easy fetch */
> >  		struct {
> > --
> > 1.9.3
Previous message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix x550 VF tx issue
Next message: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/5] add virtio offload support in us-vhost
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the dev mailing list