[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] mempool: add stack (lifo) based external mempool handler

Hunt, David david.hunt at intel.com
Mon Feb 29 12:04:44 CET 2016


On 2/19/2016 1:31 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 02/16/2016 03:48 PM, David Hunt wrote:
>> adds a simple stack based mempool handler
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/librte_mempool/Makefile            |   2 +-
>>   lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.c       |   4 +-
>>   lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool.h       |   1 +
>>   lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_stack.c | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 lib/librte_mempool/rte_mempool_stack.c
>>
> I don't get what is the purpose of this handler. Is it an example
> or is it something that could be useful for dpdk applications?
>
> If it's an example, we should find a way to put the code outside
> the librte_mempool library, maybe in the test program. I see there
> is also a "custom handler". Do we really need to have both?
They are both example handlers. I agree that we could reduce down to 
one, and since the 'custom' handler has autotests, I would suggest we 
keep that one.

The next question is where it should live. I agree that it's not ideal 
to have example code living in the same directory as the mempool 
library, but they are an integral part of the library itself. How about 
creating a handlers sub-directory? We could then keep all additional and 
sample handlers in there, away from the built-in handlers. Also, seeing 
as the handler code is intended to be part of the library, I think 
moving it out to the examples directory may confuse matters further.

Regards,
David.



More information about the dev mailing list