[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/8] bond: active slaves with no primary

Declan Doherty declan.doherty at intel.com
Tue Jan 5 14:34:13 CET 2016

On 04/12/15 17:14, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> From: Eric Kinzie <ekinzie at brocade.com>
> If the link state of a slave is "up" when added, it is added to the list
> of active slaves but, even if it is the only slave, is not selected as
> the primary interface.  Generally, handling of link state interrupts
> selects an interface to be primary, but only if the active count is zero.
> This change avoids the situation where there are active slaves but
> no primary.
> Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie <ekinzie at brocade.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty at intel.com>

More information about the dev mailing list