[dpdk-dev] DPDK mbuf pool in SR-IOV env and one RX/TX queue
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Tue Jan 26 21:18:58 CET 2016
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:15:28PM -0800, Saurabh Mishra wrote:
> Hi Bruce --
> >The sharing of the mbuf pool is not an issue, but sharing of rx/tx queues
> >The ethdev queues are not multi-thread safe, so to share a queue between
> >or threads, you need to put in locks or other access control mechanisms.
> >also implies a performance hit due to the locking]
> Right. So now we have only one process to do rx/tx on queue 0 if we detect
> that max queue support is 1.
> However, we have noticed that if our process, which does rx/tx, is not
> primary, then we can't transmit the packet out with SR-IOV.
> Is there any specific limitation on SR-IOV (the vf driver in dpdk) that
> only primary process should receive and transmit packets?
> In our model, we have an agent process which monitor links and another
> process which does packet processing. If we make our agent process as
> primary then our secondary process is not able to send the packets --
> rte_eth_tx_burst() succeed but recipient does not receive the packet.
There should be no restrictions on RX/TX from secondary processes.
More information about the dev