[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/11] drivers: fix build with new register macro

[Adrien Mazarguil]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 05:36:20PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Compilation fails because of some typos.
> 
> Fixes: cb6696d22023 ("drivers: update registration macro usage")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/aesni_mb/rte_aesni_mb_pmd.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c                    | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c                    | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/aesni_mb/rte_aesni_mb_pmd.c b/drivers/crypto/aesni_mb/rte_aesni_mb_pmd.c
> index db3e562..859a04b 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/aesni_mb/rte_aesni_mb_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/aesni_mb/rte_aesni_mb_pmd.c
> @@ -721,6 +721,6 @@ static struct rte_driver cryptodev_aesni_mb_pmd_drv = {
>  	.uninit = cryptodev_aesni_mb_uninit
>  };
>  
> -PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER(cryptodev_aesni_mb_pmd_drvi, aesni_mb);
> +PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER(cryptodev_aesni_mb_pmd_drv, aesni_mb);
>  DRIVER_REGISTER_PARAM_STRING(aesni_gcm, "max_nb_queue_pairs=<int> "
>  "max_nb_sessions=<int> socket_id=<int>");
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c
> index 8758eac..d9ffb13 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c
> @@ -5861,5 +5861,5 @@ static struct rte_driver rte_mlx4_driver = {
>  	.init = rte_mlx4_pmd_init,
>  };
>  
> -PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER(rte_mlx4_driveri, mlx4)
> +PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER(rte_mlx4_driver, mlx4);
>  DRIVER_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(mlx4, mlx4_pci_id_map);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> index 358e9b4..8d32252 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> @@ -762,5 +762,5 @@ static struct rte_driver rte_mlx5_driver = {
>  	.init = rte_mlx5_pmd_init,
>  };
>  
> -PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER(rte_mlx5_driveri, mlx5)
> +PMD_REGISTER_DRIVER(rte_mlx5_driver, mlx5);
>  DRIVER_REGISTER_PCI_TABLE(mlx5, mlx5_pci_id_map);
> -- 
> 2.7.0

Saw the issue when compiling my patchset after rebasing, thus,

Tested-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com>

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND