[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/25] DPDK PMD for ThunderX NIC device

[Jerin Jacob]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:58:27AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:01:02PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:39:25PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:36:15AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > This patch set provides the initial version of DPDK PMD for the
> > > > built-in NIC device in Cavium ThunderX SoC family.
> > > > 
> > > > Implemented features and ThunderX nicvf PMD documentation added
> > > > in doc/guides/nics/overview.rst and doc/guides/nics/thunderx.rst
> > > > respectively in this patch set.
> > > > 
> > > > These patches are checked using checkpatch.sh with following
> > > > additional ignore option:
> > > >     options="$options --ignore=CAMELCASE,BRACKET_SPACE"
> > > > CAMELCASE - To accommodate PRIx64
> > > > BRACKET_SPACE - To accommodate AT&T inline line assembly in two places
> > > > 
> > > > This patch set is based on DPDK 16.07-RC1
> > > > and tested with git HEAD change-set
> > > > ca173a909538a2f1082cd0dcb4d778a97dab69c3 along with
> > > > following depended patch
> > > > 
> > > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/11826/
> > > > ethdev: add tunnel and port RSS offload types
> > > > 
> > > Hi Jerin,
> > > 
> > > hopefully a final set of comments before merge on this set, as it's looking
> > > very good now.
> > > 
> > > * Two patches look like they need to be split, as they are combining multiple
> > >   functions into one patch. They are:
> > >     [dpdk-dev,v5,16/25] net/thunderx: add MTU set and promiscuous enable support
> > >     [dpdk-dev,v5,20/25] net/thunderx: implement supported ptype get and Rx queue count
> > >   For the other patches which add multiple functions, the functions seem to be
> > >   logically related so I don't think there is a problem
> > > 
> > > * check-git-logs.sh is warning about a few of the commit messages being too long.
> > >   Splitting patch 20 should fix one of those, but there are a few remaining.
> > >   A number of titles refer to ThunderX in the message, but this is probably
> > >   unnecessary, as the prefix already contains "net/thunderx" in it.
> > 
> > OK. I will send the next revision.
> > 
> 
> Please hold off a few hours, as I'm hoping to merge in the bnxt driver this
> afternoon. If all goes well, I would appreciate it if you could base your patchset
> off the rel_16_07 tree with that set applied - save me having to resolve conflicts
> in files like the nic overview doc, which is always a pain to try and edit. :-)

OK. I will re-base the changes once you have done with bnxt merge.
Let me know once its done.

> 
> Regards,
> /Bruce