[dpdk-dev] i40e & ixgbe xmit issue: txe->next_id

Zhe Tao zhe.tao at intel.com
Thu Mar 3 20:17:48 CET 2016


Hi all,
I have a question about why we need the txe->next_id field in the i40e&ixgbe Tx
function?
>From the current implementation, all the txe is initialized and free sequentially,
so we don't need this "next_id" field in our TX function, and when we decide the
"last_id" for txe, we assume the txe is sequential. So I suggest deprecate using
this next_id field.
Any comments will be welcome!





More information about the dev mailing list