[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/18] fm10k: update shared code

Bruce Richardson bruce.richardson at intel.com
Tue Mar 8 15:53:28 CET 2016


On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:25:27PM +0000, Chen, Jing D wrote:
> Hi, Xiao
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang, Xiao W
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 8:15 AM
> > To: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; Chen, Jing D
> > <jing.d.chen at intel.com>
> > Cc: Chen, Jing D <jing.d.chen at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; He, Shaopeng
> > <shaopeng.he at intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 00/18] fm10k: update shared code
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Richardson, Bruce
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:24 PM
> > > To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang at intel.com>; Chen, Jing D
> > > <jing.d.chen at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Chen, Jing D <jing.d.chen at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; He, Shaopeng
> > > <shaopeng.he at intel.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] fm10k: update shared code
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:06:47PM +0800, Wang Xiao W wrote:
> > > > v3:
> > > > * Fixed checkpatch.pl warning about long commit message.
> > > > * Fixed the issue of compile failure about part of patches applied.
> > > > * Split the misc-small-fixes patch into several patches.
> > > >
> > > > v2:
> > > > * Put the two extra fix patches ahead of the base code patches.
> > > >
> > > > This patch set has passed regression test.
> > > >
> > > > Wang Xiao W (18):
> > > >   fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF
> > > >   fm10k/base: correct typecast in fm10k_update_xc_addr_pf
> > > >   fm10k/base: cleanup namespace pollution
> > > >   fm10k/base: use bitshift for itr_scale
> > > >   fm10k/base: reset max_queues on init_hw_vf failure
> > > >   fm10k/base: document ITR scale workaround in VF TDLEN register
> > > >   fm10k/base: cleanup lines over 80 characters
> > > >   fm10k/base: cleanup useless else
> > > >   fm10k/base: use BIT macro instead of open-coded bit-shifting of 1
> > > >   fm10k/base: do not use CamelCase
> > > >   fm10k/base: use memcpy for mac addr copy
> > > >   fm10k/base: allow removal of is_slot_appropriate function
> > > >   fm10k/base: consistently use VLAN ID when referencing vid variables
> > > >   fm10k/base: imporve comment per upstream review changes
> > > >   fm10k/base: fix TLV structures alignment
> > > >   fm10k/base: move constants to the right of binary operators
> > > >   fm10k/base: minor cleanups
> > > >   fm10k/base: remove unused struct element
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_api.c   |   2 +
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_api.h   |   2 +
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_mbx.c   |  63 +++++++-----
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_mbx.h   |  11 +--
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_osdep.h |  32 ++++++
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.c    |  88 +++++++++--------
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_pf.h    |  18 ++--
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_tlv.c   |  40 ++++----
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_tlv.h   |   9 +-
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_type.h  | 182 +++++++---------------------
> > -------
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/base/fm10k_vf.c    |  32 ++++--
> > > >  drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c     |  41 +++-----
> > > >  12 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 298 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.3
> > > >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Can we get fm10k maintainer review and/or ack on this patchset please.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > /Bruce
> > 
> > Hi Bruce,
> > 
> > Mark has reviewed and acked the patch set in v2, and I put the "Acked-by "
> > in the v3 01/18 patch.
> > It's the same for my FTAG patch.
> > 
> 
> It's better to add acked-by in both patch set and cover letter, this may be more
> helpful for maintainers. 
> 
An earlier ack should be reflected by putting the ack on all patches of the set
in later revisions. If it's only on patch 1, that implies that only that one patch
has been acked. If the ack is included in the cover letter only, then it's likely
to be missed, as a series ack is expected as a reply to the cover letter (because
as stated above, subsequent revs should include the ack in each patch itself)

/Bruce


More information about the dev mailing list