[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] mempool: Add sanity check when secondary link in less mempools than primary

Jean Tourrilhes jt at labs.hpe.com
Fri Nov 18 17:39:34 CET 2016

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:11:12PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> Do you mind if we put back this conversation on the ML?

	Oh, I forgot to do it ? I intended to. Bummer. Please do so.

> I think your example shows that there is no linker magic: you just
> need the same linker flags for dpdk libraries than in the dpdk
> framework. I suppose we need something in the build framework
> to provide these flags externally,

	Good luck integrating that in all foreign build system (I'm
looking at you, Snort).

> but I don't think we need to patch mempool for that.

	This sanity check is just that, a sanity check. I don't
understand what's bad about a sanity check, it does not change
functionality, it does not fix anything and just warn users about
those issues.
	Please look at the patch itself at face value.

> Regards,
> Olivier



More information about the dev mailing list