[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] mempool: Add sanity check when secondary link in less mempools than primary
jt at labs.hpe.com
Fri Nov 18 17:39:34 CET 2016
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:11:12PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> Do you mind if we put back this conversation on the ML?
Oh, I forgot to do it ? I intended to. Bummer. Please do so.
> I think your example shows that there is no linker magic: you just
> need the same linker flags for dpdk libraries than in the dpdk
> framework. I suppose we need something in the build framework
> to provide these flags externally,
Good luck integrating that in all foreign build system (I'm
looking at you, Snort).
> but I don't think we need to patch mempool for that.
This sanity check is just that, a sanity check. I don't
understand what's bad about a sanity check, it does not change
functionality, it does not fix anything and just warn users about
Please look at the patch itself at face value.
More information about the dev