[dpdk-dev] [PATCH dpdk 5/5] RFC: vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct bus addresses for DMA map

Alexey Kardashevskiy aik at ozlabs.ru
Thu Apr 20 15:25:36 CEST 2017


On 20/04/17 19:04, Jonas Pfefferle1 wrote:
> Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru> wrote on 20/04/2017 09:24:02:
> 
>> From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>, JPF at zurich.ibm.com,
>> Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m at in.ibm.com>
>> Date: 20/04/2017 09:24
>> Subject: [PATCH dpdk 5/5] RFC: vfio/ppc64/spapr: Use correct bus
>> addresses for DMA map
>>
>> VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE_CREATE ioctl() returns the actual bus address for
>> just created DMA window. It happens to start from zero because the default
>> window is removed (leaving no windows) and new window starts from zero.
>> However this is not guaranteed and the new window may start from another
>> address, this adds an error check.
>>
>> Another issue is that IOVA passed to VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA should be a PCI
>> bus address while in this case a physical address of a user page is used.
>> This changes IOVA to start from zero in a hope that the rest of DPDK
>> expects this.
> 
> This is not the case. DPDK expects a 1:1 mapping PA==IOVA. It will use the
> phys_addr of the memory segment it got from /proc/self/pagemap cf.
> librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c. We could try setting it here to the
> actual iova which basically makes the whole virtual to phyiscal mapping
> with pagemap unnecessary which I believe should be the case for VFIO
> anyway. Pagemap should only be needed when using pci_uio.


Ah, ok, makes sense now. But it sure needs a big fat comment there as it is
not obvious why host RAM address is used there as DMA window start is not
guaranteed.


> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c b/lib/
>> librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> index 46f951f4d..8b8e75c4f 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.c
>> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>>  {
>>     const struct rte_memseg *ms = rte_eal_get_physmem_layout();
>>     int i, ret;
>> -
>> +   phys_addr_t io_offset;
>>     struct vfio_iommu_spapr_register_memory reg = {
>>        .argsz = sizeof(reg),
>>        .flags = 0
>> @@ -702,6 +702,13 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>>        return -1;
>>     }
>>  
>> +   io_offset = create.start_addr;
>> +   if (io_offset) {
>> +      RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "  DMA offsets other than zero is not supported, "
>> +            "new window is created at %lx\n", io_offset);
>> +      return -1;
>> +   }
>> +
>>     /* map all DPDK segments for DMA. use 1:1 PA to IOVA mapping */
>>     for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_MEMSEG; i++) {
>>        struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_map dma_map;
>> @@ -723,7 +730,7 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>>        dma_map.argsz = sizeof(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_map);
>>        dma_map.vaddr = ms[i].addr_64;
>>        dma_map.size = ms[i].len;
>> -      dma_map.iova = ms[i].phys_addr;
>> +      dma_map.iova = io_offset;
>>        dma_map.flags = VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_READ |
>>               VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE;
>>  
>> @@ -735,6 +742,7 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>>           return -1;
>>        }
>>  
>> +      io_offset += dma_map.size;
>>     }
>>  
>>     return 0;
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>>
> 


-- 
Alexey


More information about the dev mailing list