[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: consider QinQ when setting MTU
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Apr 28 14:38:04 CEST 2017
On 4/28/2017 9:27 AM, Wu, Jingjing wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 1:55 PM
>> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: consider QinQ when setting MTU
>>
>> On 4/28/2017 2:55 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
>>> When counting max packet length from MTU, count VLAN tag length twice
>>> for QinQ packets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>>> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 3fa25dc..74041ae 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>>> @@ -10593,7 +10593,7 @@ static void i40e_set_default_mac_addr(struct
>> rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>> struct i40e_pf *pf = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_PF(dev->data-
>>> dev_private);
>>> struct rte_eth_dev_data *dev_data = pf->dev_data;
>>> uint32_t frame_size = mtu + ETHER_HDR_LEN
>>> - + ETHER_CRC_LEN + I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE;
>>> + + ETHER_CRC_LEN + I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE * 2;
>>
>> Hi Wenzhuo,
>>
>> Shouldn't we check if QinQ enabled before taking size account?
>
> Hi, Ferruh
>
> Checking QinQ enabled here makes no sense, because we don't know
> If the packets is carry single vlan or double vlan.
What do you think commenting code to say "I40E_VLAN_TAG_SIZE * 2" is for
QinQ?
It is not obvious and in the feature somebody not thinking about QinQ
use case may miss this, and do something wrong, even can fix this J
>
> Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list