[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] doc: Clarify wording regarding actions and flow rules.
Adrien Mazarguil
adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com
Mon Dec 4 14:51:54 CET 2017
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:26:39AM -0800, Roy Franz wrote:
> Current wording regarding actions and flow rules doesn't make sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz at cavium.com>
> ---
> Maybe a better word than 'assigned' could be chosen? (attached,
> associated with, etc) I'm happy to spin this if needed.
Agreed, "affected" doesn't make much sense here. I think "assigned" is the
best compromise (intelligibility / changes ratio).
This clarification is also a worthy candidate for stable at dpdk.org.
Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com>
--
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND
More information about the dev
mailing list