[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto: fix pedantic compilation errors

Nelio Laranjeiro nelio.laranjeiro at 6wind.com
Mon Dec 11 13:42:49 CET 2017


Hi Pablo,

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:49:39AM +0000, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nelio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranjeiro at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 10:03 AM
> > To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal at nxp.com>; Doherty, Declan
> > <declan.doherty at intel.com>
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet at 6wind.com>; De Lara
> > Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; stable at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] crypto: fix pedantic compilation errors
> > 
> 
> ...
> 
> > --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto.h
> > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ struct rte_crypto_op {
> >  	rte_iova_t phys_addr;
> >  	/**< physical address of crypto operation */
> > 
> > -	RTE_STD_C11
> > +	__extension__
> 
> Hi Nelio,
> 
> Since RTE_STD_C11 is basically __extension__ when __STDC_VERSION__ is not defined,
> Is this forcing __extension__ to be used no matter what? (even if C11 is not supported).

Yes

Thanks,

-- 
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND


More information about the dev mailing list