[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/26] eal: return error instead of panic for cpu init
Bruce Richardson
bruce.richardson at intel.com
Mon Feb 27 14:00:23 CET 2017
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:02:45AM -0500, Aaron Conole wrote:
> There may be no way to gracefully recover, but the application
> should be notified that a failure happened, rather than completely
> aborting. This allows the user to proceed with a "slow-path" type
> solution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole at redhat.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> index bf6b818..5023d0d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c
> @@ -740,6 +740,12 @@ static int rte_eal_vfio_setup(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void rte_eal_init_alert(const char *msg)
> +{
> + fprintf(stderr, "EAL: FATAL: %s\n", msg);
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "%s\n", msg);
> +}
Checkpatch flags the use of spaces rather than tabs here.
/Bruce
More information about the dev
mailing list