[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/18] lib: add symbol versioning to distributor
david.hunt at intel.com
Mon Mar 13 12:02:17 CET 2017
On 13/3/2017 11:01 AM, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Hunt, David
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 09/18] lib: add symbol versioning to distributor
>> On 10/3/2017 4:22 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:10:24AM +0000, David Hunt wrote:
>>>> Also bumped up the ABI version number in the Makefile
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt at intel.com>
>>>> lib/librte_distributor/Makefile | 2 +-
>>>> lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c | 57 +++++++++++---
>>>> lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor_v1705.h | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> A file named rte_distributor_v1705.h was added in patch 4, then deleted
>>> in patch 7, and now added again here. Seems a lot of churn.
>> The first introduction of this file is what will become the public
>> header. For successful compilation,
>> this cannot be called rte_distributor.h until the symbol versioning
>> patch, at which stage I will
>> rename the file, and introduce the symbol versioned header at the same
>> time. In the next patch
>> I'll rename this version of the files as rte_distributor_public.h to
>> make this clearer.
> Suggestion to use rte_distributor_next.h instead of public?
> Public doesn't indicate if its old or new, while next would make that clearer IMO :)
Good call, will use "_next". Its clearer.
More information about the dev