[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix DPAA2 guide build warning

Mcnamara, John john.mcnamara at intel.com
Mon Mar 27 12:31:21 CEST 2017



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mcnamara, John
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 11:16 AM
> To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix DPAA2 guide build warning
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shreyansh Jain [mailto:shreyansh.jain at nxp.com]
> > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 10:55 AM
> > To: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>
> > Cc: hemant.agrawal at nxp.com; dev at dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John
> > <john.mcnamara at intel.com>; Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix DPAA2 guide build warning
> >
> > Fixes: 17a4c3c16f5c ("doc: add DPAA2 NIC details")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain at nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/guides/nics/dpaa2.rst | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/dpaa2.rst b/doc/guides/nics/dpaa2.rst
> > index
> > 7d7a6c5..46225b6 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/nics/dpaa2.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/dpaa2.rst
> > @@ -441,8 +441,7 @@ compatible board:
> >
> >  1. **ARM 64 Tool Chain**
> >
> > -   For example, the *aarch64* Linaro Toolchain, which can be obtained
> > from
> > -   `here
> <https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/4.9-
> > 2017.01/aarch64-linux-gnu>`_.
> > +   For example, the `*aarch64* Linaro Toolchain
> > <https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/4.9-
> > 2017.01/aarch64-linux-gnu>`_.
> >
> 
> What is the build warning?
> 
> Also, the existing version with the `here <link>`_ format is better since
> it doesn't put a long url into the text. Probably it is better to fix that
> if it that is the issue.
> 

Whoops, sorry. I misread the patch. I see that you are still using `here <link>`_
so disregard that comment.

I would still be good to see the build issue though.



More information about the dev mailing list