[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] consistent PMD batching behaviour

[Ferruh Yigit]

On 3/29/2017 8:16 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
> The rte_eth_tx_burst() function in the file Rte_ethdev.h is invoked to
> transmit output packets on the output queue for DPDK applications as
> follows.
> 
> static inline uint16_t
> rte_eth_tx_burst(uint8_t port_id, uint16_t queue_id,
>                  struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts);
> 
> Note: The fourth parameter nb_pkts: The number of packets to transmit.
> 
> The rte_eth_tx_burst() function returns the number of packets it actually
> sent. Most of PMD drivers can support the policy "send as many packets to
> transmit as possible" at the PMD level. but the few of PMDs have some sort
> of artificial limits for the pkts sent successfully. For example, VHOST tx
> burst size is limited to 32 packets. Some rx_burst functions have the
> similar problem. The main benefit is consistent batching behavior for user
> to simplify their logic and avoid misusage at the application level, there
> is unified rte_eth_tx/rx_burst interface already, there is no reason for
> inconsistent behaviors. 
> This patchset fixes it via adding wrapper function at the PMD level.
> 
> Changes in V3:
> 
> 1. Updated release_17_05 in patch 5/5
> 2. Rebase on top of next net tree. i40e_rxtx_vec_altivec.c is updated in
> patch 2/5.
> 3. fix one checkpatch issue in 2/5. 
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 1. rename ixgbe, i40e and fm10k vec function XXX_xmit_pkts_vec to new name
> XXX_xmit_fixed_burst_vec, new wrapper functions use original name
> XXX_xmit_pkts_vec according to Bruce's suggestion.
> 2. simplify the code to avoid the if or if/else.
> 
> Zhiyong Yang (5):
>   net/fm10k: remove limit of fm10k_xmit_pkts_vec burst size
>   net/i40e: remove limit of i40e_xmit_pkts_vec burst size
>   net/ixgbe: remove limit of ixgbe_xmit_pkts_vec burst size
>   net/vhost: remove limit of vhost TX burst size
>   net/vhost: remove limit of vhost RX burst size

Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.

(doc patch exported into separate patch)

This is the PMD update on fast path, effected PMDs, can you please
confirm the performance after test?