[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] examples: increase port_id range

[Yang, Zhiyong]

Hi , Dave:

Thanks for your reminder.
It looks like that  I don't cover the folder /test/,  if needed, I will cover them next version.

Thanks
Zhiyong
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunt, David
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 10:16 PM
> To: Yang, Zhiyong <zhiyong.yang at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: thomas at monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Wiles, Keith
> <keith.wiles at intel.com>; stephen at networkplumber.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] examples: increase port_id range
> 
> Hi Zhiyong,
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/9/2017 6:57 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote:
> > Modify port_id related code in examples accordingly since port_id
> > definition in lib and pmd changes.
> >
> > Fix some original checkpatch issues and remove some unnecessary cast
> > at the same time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang at intel.com>
> > ---
> ---big snip---
> 
> 
> I noticed that in /test/test/test_pmd_perf.c after applying the patch set,
> RTE_PORT_ALL is still 8-bit:
> 
> -#define RTE_PORT_ALL            (~(uint8_t)0x0)
> 
> This probably needs to be:
> 
> +#define RTE_PORT_ALL            (~(portid_t)0x0)
> 
> Regards,
> Dave.
> 
> 
>