[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add uevent monitor for hot plug

Guo, Jia jia.guo at intel.com
Tue Sep 5 07:28:03 CEST 2017


Thanks Stephen for your review and suggestion, I will involve them in next version.

Best regards,
Jeff Guo

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] 
Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 12:12 AM
To: Guo, Jia <jia.guo at intel.com>
Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; dev at dpdk.org; gaetan.rivet at 6wind.com; shreyansh.jain at nxp.com; jblunck at infradead.org; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang at intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit at intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev at intel.com>; thomas at monjalon.net; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add uevent monitor for hot plug

On Sun,  3 Sep 2017 23:49:44 +0800
Jeff Guo <jia.guo at intel.com> wrote:

> +int
> +rte_eal_uev_enable(int netlink_fd)
> +{
> +	struct sockaddr_nl addr;
> +	int ret;
> +	int size = 64 * 1024;
> +	int nonblock = 1;
> +	memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr));

Blank line between declarations and code.
Also use C99 style intializations not memset.

> +	addr.nl_family = AF_NETLINK;
> +	addr.nl_pid = 0;
> +	addr.nl_groups = 0xffffffff;

You don't need or want all events. specify which group you want.

> +
> +	setsockopt(netlink_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUFFORCE, &size, sizeof(size));

Don't user BUFFORCE, that is only available as root. Just doing SO_RCVBUF is enough.


More information about the dev mailing list