[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/bnxt: switch to the new offload API

Ferruh Yigit ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu Apr 5 16:36:00 CEST 2018


On 4/2/2018 11:25 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Update bnxt PMD to new ethdev offloads API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde at broadcom.com>
> --
> v1->v2: return an error if requested offload flags do not
> match supported offload capabilities.
> v2->v3: modify the code based on review comments.

<...>

> @@ -516,6 +526,20 @@ static void bnxt_dev_info_get_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev,
>  static int bnxt_dev_configure_op(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>  {
>  	struct bnxt *bp = (struct bnxt *)eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> +	uint64_t tx_offloads = eth_dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
> +	uint64_t rx_offloads = eth_dev->data->dev_conf.rxmode.offloads;
> +
> +	if (tx_offloads != (tx_offloads & BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT)) {
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
> +			    tx_offloads, BNXT_DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT);
> +		return -ENOTSUP;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rx_offloads != (rx_offloads & BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT)) {
> +		PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
> +			    rx_offloads, BNXT_DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SUPPORT);
> +		return -ENOTSUP;
> +	}

This is causing i686 build error [1].

[1]
In file included from .../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:43:0:

.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c: In function ‘bnxt_dev_configure_op’:
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:341:50: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of
type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long
unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
  rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, bnxt_logtype_driver, "%s(): " fmt, \
                                                  ^
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:345:2: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW’
  PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW(level, fmt, ## args)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:528:3: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG’
   PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
   ^~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:528:47: note: format string is defined here
   PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Tx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
                                             ~~^
                                             %llx
In file included from .../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:43:0:
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:341:50: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of
type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long
unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
  rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, bnxt_logtype_driver, "%s(): " fmt, \
                                                  ^
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt.h:345:2: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW’
  PMD_DRV_LOG_RAW(level, fmt, ## args)
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:534:3: note: in expansion of macro
‘PMD_DRV_LOG’
   PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
   ^~~~~~~~~~~
.../dpdk/drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c:534:47: note: format string is defined here
   PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Rx offloads requested 0x%lx supported 0x%x\n",
                                             ~~^
                                             %llx
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors


More information about the dev mailing list