[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] ethdev: check Rx/Tx offloads
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Thu Apr 26 18:11:43 CEST 2018
On 4/26/2018 4:50 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/26/2018 3:37 PM, Wei Dai wrote:
>> This patch check if a requested offloading is supported
>> in the device capability.
>> Any offloading is disabled by default if it is not set
>> in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) and rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup().
>> A per port offloading can only be enabled in
>> rte_eth_dev_configure(). If a per port offloading is
>> sent to rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ), return error.
>> Only per queue offloading can be sent to
>> rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ). A per queue offloading is
>> enabled only if it is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ) OR
>> if it is enabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>> If a per queue offloading is enabled in rte_eth_dev_configure(),
>> it can't be disabled in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>> If a per queue offloading is disabled in rte_eth_dev_configure( ),
>> it can be enabled or disabled( ) in rte_eth_[rt]x_queue_setup( ).
>>
>> This patch can make such checking in a common way in rte_ethdev
>> layer to avoid same checking in underlying PMD.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai at intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
>> index f0f53d4..5485f47 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
>> @@ -1196,6 +1196,28 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>> ETHER_MAX_LEN;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Any requested offload must be within its device capability */
>> + if ((local_conf.rxmode.offloads & dev_info.rx_offload_capa) !=
>> + local_conf.rxmode.offloads) {
>> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Rx offloads "
>> + "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Rx offloads "
>> + "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
>> + port_id,
>> + local_conf.rxmode.offloads,
>> + dev_info.rx_offload_capa);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + if ((local_conf.txmode.offloads & dev_info.tx_offload_capa) !=
>> + local_conf.txmode.offloads) {
>> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("ethdev port_id=%d requested Tx offloads "
>> + "0x%" PRIx64 " doesn't match Tx offloads "
>> + "capability 0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
>> + port_id,
>> + local_conf.txmode.offloads,
>> + dev_info.tx_offload_capa);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Setup new number of RX/TX queues and reconfigure device.
>> */
>> @@ -1547,6 +1569,23 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
>> &local_conf.offloads);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from application.
>> + * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
>
> This comment doesn't match below check, below doesn't check pure per-port offload
>
>> + */
>> + if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa) !=
>> + local_conf.offloads) {> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d rx_queue_id=%d "
>> + "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
>> + "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
>> + " in rte_eth_rx_queue_setup( )\n",
>> + port_id,
>> + rx_queue_id,
>> + local_conf.offloads,
>> + dev_info.rx_queue_offload_capa);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> Lets add one more check and consider this for rc1, later we can update checks
> for suggested API in rc2.
>
> Check to add (this is for existing API)
> If a pure per-port update enabled configure, it should be enabled in
> queue_setup() as well.
According comment from Thomas, lets target directly rc2, new API. For that I
think we still need an update to this patch.
In previous version of this patch there was a comment to strip port_offloads
from requested offloads before passing vales to PMD.
Just to highlight not strip port_capability, but port_offloads set by configure()
The logic is if an offload set in configure(), both port level offload or queue
level offload, no need to duplicate it for PMD.
>
>
>> +
>> ret = (*dev->dev_ops->rx_queue_setup)(dev, rx_queue_id, nb_rx_desc,
>> socket_id, &local_conf, mp);
>> if (!ret) {
>> @@ -1681,6 +1720,23 @@ rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t tx_queue_id,
>> &local_conf.offloads);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Only per-queue offload can be enabled from applcation.
>> + * If any pure per-port offload is sent to this function, return -EINVAL
>> + */
>> + if ((local_conf.offloads & dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa) !=
>> + local_conf.offloads) {
>> + RTE_PMD_DEBUG_TRACE("Ethdev port_id=%d tx_queue_id=%d "
>> + "Requested offload 0x%" PRIx64 "doesn't "
>> + "match per-queue capability 0x%" PRIx64
>> + " in rte_eth_tx_queue_setup( )\n",
>> + port_id,
>> + tx_queue_id,
>> + local_conf.offloads,
>> + dev_info.tx_queue_offload_capa);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> return eth_err(port_id, (*dev->dev_ops->tx_queue_setup)(dev,
>> tx_queue_id, nb_tx_desc, socket_id, &local_conf));
>> }
>>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list