[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoGRE encapsulation

[Ori Kam]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dekel Peled
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 10:18 AM
> To: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; wenzhuo.lu at intel.com;
> jingjing.wu at intel.com; bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at mellanox.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoGRE encapsulation
> 
> Thanks, PSB.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ori Kam
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 11:23 PM
> > To: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>; wenzhuo.lu at intel.com;
> > jingjing.wu at intel.com; bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Shahaf Shuler <shahafs at mellanox.com>; Dekel Peled
> > <dekelp at mellanox.com>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoGRE encapsulation
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dev <dev-bounces at dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Dekel Peled
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 3:52 PM
> > > To: wenzhuo.lu at intel.com; jingjing.wu at intel.com;
> > > bernard.iremonger at intel.com
> > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> > > <shahafs at mellanox.com>; Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix MPLSoGRE encapsulation
> > >
> > > In function cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_parsed(), MPLS label value was set
> > > in mplsogre_encap_conf struct without the required offset.
> > > As a result the value was copied incorrectly into rte_flow_item_mpls
> > > struct.
> > >
> > > This patch sets MPLS label value in appropriate location at
> > > mplsogre_encap_conf struct, so it is correctly copied to
> > > rte_flow_item_mpls struct.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3e77031be855 ("app/testpmd: add MPLSoGRE encapsulation")
> > > Cc: orika at mellanox.com
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp at mellanox.com>
> > > ---
> > >  app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 7 +++----
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c index
> > > 8630be6..3ddc3e0 100644
> > > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > > @@ -15567,10 +15567,9 @@ static void
> > > cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_parsed(void *parsed_result,
> > >  	struct cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_result *res = parsed_result;
> > >  	union {
> > >  		uint32_t mplsogre_label;
> > > -		uint8_t label[3];
> > > +		uint8_t label[4];
> > >  	} id = {
> > > -		.mplsogre_label =
> > > -			rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label) &
> > RTE_BE32(0x00ffffff),
> > > +		.mplsogre_label = rte_cpu_to_be_32(res->label<<12),
> >
> > Why did you remove the mask?
> 
> The mask of all valid bits set to 1 is redundant.
> After <<12 the 20 valid bits are not changed, and the other 12 bits are set to 0.
> 
> >
> > >  	};
> > >
> > >  	if (strcmp(res->mplsogre, "mplsogre_encap") == 0) @@ -15583,7
> > > +15582,7 @@ static void cmd_set_mplsogre_encap_parsed(void
> > > *parsed_result,
> > >  		mplsogre_encap_conf.select_ipv4 = 0;
> > >  	else
> > >  		return;
> > > -	rte_memcpy(mplsogre_encap_conf.label, &id.label[1], 3);
> > > +	rte_memcpy(mplsogre_encap_conf.label, &id.label, 3);
> > >  	if (mplsogre_encap_conf.select_ipv4) {
> > >  		IPV4_ADDR_TO_UINT(res->ip_src,
> > > mplsogre_encap_conf.ipv4_src);
> > >  		IPV4_ADDR_TO_UINT(res->ip_dst,
> > > mplsogre_encap_conf.ipv4_dst);
> > > --
> > > 1.8.3.1
> >
> > Best,
> > Ori

Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika at mellanox.com>
Thanks,
Ori