[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] test/rwlock: add perf test case
Joyce Kong
joyce.kong at arm.com
Thu Dec 13 04:37:44 CET 2018
Add performance test on all available cores to benchmark
the scaling up performance and fairness of rw_lock.
Fixes: af75078faf ("first public release")
Cc: stable at dpdk.org
Suggested-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu at arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljedahl at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang at arm.com>
---
test/test/test_rwlock.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
diff --git a/test/test/test_rwlock.c b/test/test/test_rwlock.c
index 29171c4..4766c09 100644
--- a/test/test/test_rwlock.c
+++ b/test/test/test_rwlock.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/queue.h>
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@
static rte_rwlock_t sl;
static rte_rwlock_t sl_tab[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
+static rte_atomic32_t synchro;
static int
test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
@@ -65,6 +67,72 @@ test_rwlock_per_core(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
return 0;
}
+static rte_rwlock_t lk = RTE_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+static uint64_t lock_count[RTE_MAX_LCORE] = {0};
+
+#define TIME_MS 100
+
+static int
+load_loop_fn(__attribute__((unused)) void *arg)
+{
+ uint64_t time_diff = 0, begin;
+ uint64_t hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
+ uint64_t lcount = 0;
+ const unsigned int lcore = rte_lcore_id();
+
+ /* wait synchro for slaves */
+ if (lcore != rte_get_master_lcore())
+ while (rte_atomic32_read(&synchro) == 0)
+ ;
+
+ begin = rte_rdtsc_precise();
+ while (time_diff < hz * TIME_MS / 1000) {
+ rte_rwlock_write_lock(&lk);
+ rte_pause();
+ rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&lk);
+ rte_rwlock_read_lock(&lk);
+ rte_rwlock_read_lock(&lk);
+ rte_pause();
+ rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&lk);
+ rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&lk);
+ lcount++;
+ /* delay to make lock duty cycle slightly realistic */
+ rte_pause();
+ time_diff = rte_rdtsc_precise() - begin;
+ }
+ lock_count[lcore] = lcount;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+test_rwlock_perf(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ uint64_t total = 0;
+
+ printf("\nRwlock Perf Test on %u cores...\n", rte_lcore_count());
+
+ /* clear synchro and start slaves */
+ rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 0);
+ if (rte_eal_mp_remote_launch(load_loop_fn, NULL, SKIP_MASTER) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
+ /* start synchro and launch test on master */
+ rte_atomic32_set(&synchro, 1);
+ load_loop_fn(NULL);
+
+ rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+
+ RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(i) {
+ printf("Core [%u] count = %"PRIu64"\n", i, lock_count[i]);
+ total += lock_count[i];
+ }
+
+ printf("Total count = %"PRIu64"\n", total);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
test_rwlock(void)
{
@@ -95,6 +163,9 @@ test_rwlock(void)
rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
+ if (test_rwlock_perf() < 0)
+ return -1;
+
return 0;
}
--
2.7.4
More information about the dev
mailing list