[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
Ferruh Yigit
ferruh.yigit at intel.com
Fri Dec 21 16:30:31 CET 2018
On 9/4/2017 3:53 PM, sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com (Sergio Gonzalez
Monroy) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24/08/2016 23:17, amin.tootoonchian at intel.com (Tootoonchian, Amin)
> wrote:
>> Sergio, could you please review this patch?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amin
>
> The patch status should be updated to 'Not Applicable' since similar
> functionality has been implemented (commit d948f596).
> Only Primary processes are allowed to call rte_eth_dev_allocate(), while
> Secondary processes should call rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary()
Agreed with comment, and even after that comment many thing changed in multi
process support. Patch status updated as 'Not Applicable'.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergio
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:12 AM
>>> To: Tootoonchian, Amin <amin.tootoonchian at intel.com>
>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Kerlin, MarcinX <marcinx.kerlin at intel.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: ensure consistent port id assignment
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2016-07-20 15:07, Tootoonchian, Amin:
>>>> Thomas, your thoughts?
>>> I have 2 thoughts:
>>> - it is too big for 16.07
>>> - it is related to multi-process mechanism, maintained by Sergio ;)
>>>
>>> Sorry I won't look at it shortly.
>
>
>
More information about the dev
mailing list