[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] relicense various bits of the dpdk

[Thomas Monjalon]

01/02/2018 13:49, Hemant Agrawal:
> On 2/1/2018 5:49 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > Received a note the other day from the Linux Foundation governance board
> > for DPDK indicating that several files I have copyright on need to be
> > relicensed to be compliant with the DPDK licensing guidelines.  I have
> > some concerns with some parts of the request, but am not opposed to
> > other parts.  So, for those pieces that we are in consensus on, I'm
> > proposing that we change their license from BSD 2 clause to 3 clause.
> > I'm also updating the files to use the SPDX licensing scheme
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman at tuxdriver.com>
> > CC: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>
> > CC: Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net>
> 
> Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>

Applied, thanks