[dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

Verma, Shally Shally.Verma at cavium.com
Fri Jan 12 14:53:36 CET 2018


Hi Fiona

> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.
Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be created once API spec move from RFC to 1st version?

Thanks
Shally

From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:fiona.trahe at intel.com] 
Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31
To: Verma, Shally <Shally.Verma at cavium.com>; dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta at cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <Sunila.Sahu at cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal <Mahipal.Challa at cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya at cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain at intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge at nxp.com>; Youri Querry <youri.querry_1 at nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <ahmed.mansour at nxp.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe at intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

Hi Shally,


From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma at cavium.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:fiona.trahe at intel.com>; mailto:dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:Ashish.Gupta at cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <mailto:Sunila.Sahu at cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal <mailto:Mahipal.Challa at cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <mailto:NarayanaPrasad.Athreya at cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <mailto:pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <mailto:deepak.k.jain at intel.com>; Roy Pledge <mailto:roy.pledge at nxp.com>; Youri Querry <mailto:youri.querry_1 at nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <mailto:hemant.agrawal at nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <mailto:ahmed.mansour at nxp.com>
Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

Hi Fiona 

We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would like to check
If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we could leverage joint effort. 
Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch.

Let me know your opinion on same.
[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you would do this, I agree it's a 
good way to prove out the API.
We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share these with you, and continue to develop these
jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs. 
I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.

Thanks
Shally



More information about the dev mailing list