[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging

[Neil Horman]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:15:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/01/2018 16:54, Neil Horman:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:46:27PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 22/01/2018 02:48, Neil Horman:
> > > > v5 Changes
> > > > * Clean ups suggested by Thomas
> > > 
> > > There were a lot of new functions to tag when rebasing this v5.
> > > Rebased and applied, thanks.
> > > 
> > Sorry, not clear what you mean by this.   Are you saying that there were several
> > new experimental API's added recently that my initial set of tags missed?  If
> > so, thanks for doing that.  I will also be sending another patch set soon, to
> > reconcile API's that are documented as experimental but not listed in the
> > version map as such
> 
> I meant that I have applied a lot of new experimental functions
> after you sent the v5.
> So I had to add the tag and CFLAGS for these new functions.
> Usual rebase work.
> 
Understood, thank you.

> About reconciling experimental functions and map,
> we should also consider upgrading some functions to non-experimental.
> 
I figured if I were to just do a reconcilliation of everything that is currently
documented as experimental, that would be the impetus for their authors to yell
at me about their not actually being experimental anymore, and I could fix that
up in subsequent versions :)
Neil

> 
>