[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] hash: make duplicated code into functions
De Lara Guarch, Pablo
pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com
Fri Jul 6 12:04:11 CEST 2018
Hi Yipeng,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Yipeng1
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 1:25 PM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch at intel.com>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Wang, Yipeng1 <yipeng1.wang at intel.com>; Richardson,
> Bruce <bruce.richardson at intel.com>; honnappa.nagarahalli at arm.com;
> vguvva at caviumnetworks.com; brijesh.s.singh at gmail.com
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] hash: make duplicated code into functions
>
> This commit refactors the hash table lookup/add/del code to remove some code
> duplication. Processing on primary bucket can also apply to secondary bucket
> with same code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang at intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
...
> +/* Search one bucket to find the match key */
> static inline int32_t
> -__rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
> - hash_sig_t sig, void **data)
> +search_one_bucket(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key, hash_sig_t sig,
> + void **data, struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt)
Use "const" in "struct rte_hash_bucket".
...
> +search_and_remove(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
> + struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt, hash_sig_t sig,
> + int32_t *ret_val)
> {
> - uint32_t bucket_idx;
> - hash_sig_t alt_hash;
> - unsigned i;
> - struct rte_hash_bucket *bkt;
> struct rte_hash_key *k, *keys = h->key_store;
> - int32_t ret;
> -
> - bucket_idx = sig & h->bucket_bitmask;
> - bkt = &h->buckets[bucket_idx];
> + unsigned int i;
>
> /* Check if key is in primary location */
> for (i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) { @@ -833,37 +825,39
> @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
> * Return index where key is stored,
> * subtracting the first dummy index
> */
> - ret = bkt->key_idx[i] - 1;
> + *ret_val = bkt->key_idx[i] - 1;
> bkt->key_idx[i] = EMPTY_SLOT;
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
You can store ret_val and return it, instead of returning 0,
so the function is similar to the other search functions.
> }
> }
> }
> + return -1;
More information about the dev
mailing list