[dpdk-dev] DPDK and forked processes

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:03:48 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas at monjalon.net> wrote:

> 27/07/2018 15:46, Eads, Gage:
> > As this discussion has broad implications for DPDK, is it a good candidate for a techboard meeting topic?   
> 
> We can discuss it in techboard, but usually we prefer discussing topics
> whose resolution is not clear.
> In this case, I think everybody agree with Anatoly, isn't it?

I would prefer that decisions like this be done by rough consensus on the mailing list.

As far as applications messing with internals, in reality any application can change
anything. Just don't come crying to DPDK community for help.